3.5
5
8 ratings
Check all the 13 reviews find on Laptops Corsair Voyager a1600, with the 8 ratings, comments, pros & cons from the reviewers.
Theses reviews and tests from Laptops magazines and websites give 8 ratings, we get this average rating to this Corsair product : 3.5/5.
En bref
- 13 reviews and opinions with 8 ratings for Corsair Voyager a1600
- We obtain an average score of 3.5/5, or 69.63/100
Corsair Voyager a1600 ratings
8 Ratings ranked from best to worst, green to good grades, red to bad,
Average rating: 3.5/5.
Source: https://www.commentChoisir.fr
| 87/100 NotebookCheck | 8/10 CharlesTech | 4/5 CowCotLand.com |
| 7/10 KitGuru | 3/5 PCMag | 3/5 Tom's Guide (US) |
| 3/5 GamesRadar | 3/5 Tom's Hardware |
5 Preview or review without rating: ComputerBase, PCWorld.com, FrAndroid, Focus-Numerique, TechPowerUp
Pros and cons for Corsair Voyager a1600 List of reviews and ratings
To better compare, we looked for you the advantages and disadvantages of Below and the notes given by specialized sites.
87
100
NotebookCheck
High CPU and GPU performance
12 GB VRAM
32GB DDR5 RAM
2TB SSD
Very good execution
Slim design
Fast, calibrated 240Hz display
no PWM and no cloud
Very large touchpad
mechanical buttons with Cherry MX switches
Features of Elgato Stream Deck
Corsair Wake
12 GB VRAM
32GB DDR5 RAM
2TB SSD
Very good execution
Slim design
Fast, calibrated 240Hz display
no PWM and no cloud
Very large touchpad
mechanical buttons with Cherry MX switches
Features of Elgato Stream Deck
Corsair Wake
High frequency fan noise
no 4K option
Below-average SSD performance
Full HD webcam only
no RJ-45
no 4K option
Below-average SSD performance
Full HD webcam only
no RJ-45
reviewed at 06/12/2022 - [read the full review on NotebookCheck]
8
10
CharlesTech
reviewed at 04/05/2023 - [read the full review on CharlesTech]
4
5
CowCotLand.com
QHD
+ is a term used to describe a display resolution that is higher than Quad HD (QHD).
240 Hz
No color or light leakage.
Little ghosting
very good quality
Macro / Stream Deck
Good angles of view
Keyboard
+ is a term used to describe a display resolution that is higher than Quad HD (QHD).
240 Hz
No color or light leakage.
Little ghosting
very good quality
Macro / Stream Deck
Good angles of view
Keyboard
Performance
rate
rate
reviewed at 24/07/2023 - [read the full review on CowCotLand.com]
7
10
KitGuru
reviewed at 18/08/2022 - [read the full review on KitGuru]
3
5
PCMag
Top-notch build
240Hz 16:10 screen
Mechanical keyboard, huge touchpad
Unique shortcut bar
1080p webcam
Thunderbolt 4
240Hz 16:10 screen
Mechanical keyboard, huge touchpad
Unique shortcut bar
1080p webcam
Thunderbolt 4
Too pricey for its middling gaming performance
reviewed at 06/09/2022 - [read the full review on PCMag]
3
5
Tom's Guide (US)
+
Powerful components
+
Excellent keyboard
+
Decent speakers
Powerful components
+
Excellent keyboard
+
Decent speakers
-
Awkward design
-
Uneven performance
-
Tedious, broken software
Awkward design
-
Uneven performance
-
Tedious, broken software
reviewed at 19/09/2022 - [read the full review on Tom's Guide (US)]
3
5
GamesRadar
reviewed at 06/10/2022 - [read the full review on GamesRadar]
3
5
Tom's Hardware
reviewed at 18/11/2022 - [read the full review on Tom's Hardware]
-
not scored
ComputerBaseQuality of processing and choice of materials
Display (QHD, IPS, 240 Hz, 360 cd/m²)
Performance (esp. Applications)
Variety of connections
Keyboard and touchpad
Warranty maintenance and upgrades
Display (QHD, IPS, 240 Hz, 360 cd/m²)
Performance (esp. Applications)
Variety of connections
Keyboard and touchpad
Warranty maintenance and upgrades
Volume under load (Balanced/Extreme Profile)
Reliable AMD SmartShift Max only in Extreme profile
AMD Smart Access Graphics in the test without function
Webcam video quality
Battery life despite 99 Wh battery
Reliable AMD SmartShift Max only in Extreme profile
AMD Smart Access Graphics in the test without function
Webcam video quality
Battery life despite 99 Wh battery
reviewed at 23/09/2022 - [read the full review on ComputerBase]
-
not scored
PCWorld.com240Hz display with good motion clarity
Excellent keyboard and touchpad
Strong processor performance
Excellent keyboard and touchpad
Strong processor performance
Game performance relies on annoying ‘Extreme’ mode
Streamer-centric features are of questionable use
Build quality can’t match Razer or Alienware
Streamer-centric features are of questionable use
Build quality can’t match Razer or Alienware
reviewed at 19/10/2022 - [read the full review on PCWorld.com]
-
not scored
FrAndroidSuccessful "all aluminum" design
Mechanical keyboard and giant touchpad
Impeccable construction and finishes
Efficient steam chamber
Interesting concept, to dig (Stream Deck, S-Keys, Slipstream)
Mechanical keyboard and giant touchpad
Impeccable construction and finishes
Efficient steam chamber
Interesting concept, to dig (Stream Deck, S-Keys, Slipstream)
Overpriced rate
Average performance for price
Poor webcam
Just fair autonomy
Software not always up to date
Average performance for price
Poor webcam
Just fair autonomy
Software not always up to date
reviewed at 30/10/2022 - [read the full review on FrAndroid]
-
not scored
Focus-Numerique reviewed at 05/11/2022 - [read the full review on Focus-Numerique]
-
not scored
TechPowerUp reviewed at 24/11/2022 - [read the full review on TechPowerUp]
Corsair Voyager a1600 Users & Customers reviews
(affiliate links)
Info and Conclusion
Corsair Voyager a1600 review : Corsair Voyager a1600 seems to be good in the Laptops category, so overall reviews are positive for this product.
What rating did Corsair Voyager a1600 get?
An average rating of 3.5/5 with 8 ratings.What price ?
(Check the price: amazon)
Reviews of others Laptops Corsair
Test Corsair One i300, Test Corsair One, Test Corsair 5000D,... and find all reviews find for brand Corsair
Your review and rating for Corsair Voyager a1600:
Did you buy or tested this product ?
Others Laptops:
[4.3/5] Dell XPS 14
[4.3/5] Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra
[4.8/5] Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro
[4.3/5] Asus ZenBook Duo
[4.2/5] Geekom X14 Pro
[4.3/5] Dell XPS 14
[4.3/5] Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra
[4.8/5] Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro
[4.3/5] Asus ZenBook Duo
[4.2/5] Geekom X14 Pro